Measuring contraceptive values: An alternative approach
Copyright policy )Measuring contraceptive values: An alternative approach
Previous assessments of individuals' values for various contraceptive consequences have employed one of four methodologies: free elicitation, direct ratings, multiple regression, or factor analysis. All four methodologies are flawed because they produce group rather than individual values, relying on rating scales, and fail to incorporate information regarding consequence trade-offs. Axiomatic conjoint measurement is proposed as an alternative methodology and used to determine individuals' values for a selected set of contraceptive consequences at two stages of the family-planning career.
- University of Colorado System United States
- University of Colorado Boulder United States
Male, Decision Making, Individuality, Contraception, Attitude, Research Design, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Family Planning Services, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Contraception Behavior
Male, Decision Making, Individuality, Contraception, Attitude, Research Design, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Family Planning Services, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Contraception Behavior
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!