
Eight patients in a cardiac rehabilitation program, after exposure to two psychological stressors approximately equivalent with respect to cardiovascular reactivity, were given nonconcurrent progressive muscle relaxation training and retested for reactivity. They were then provided with relaxation training concurrently with one of the stressors and exposed again to the two stressors. No significant effects for nonconcurrent progressive muscle relaxation training were detected. Concurrent training, in contrast, produced reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Reductions resulting from training on the target stressor showed little tendency to generalize to the nontarget stressor; the discrimination was particularly well defined for systolic blood pressure. We conclude that muscle relaxation techniques are maximally effective in reducing reactivity to psychological stressors when relaxation training is provided concurrently with the stressor. Our findings further suggest that to inculcate the relaxation response reliably across different situations, specific training to enhance generalization may be needed.
Male, Myocardial Infarction, Blood Pressure, Coronary Disease, Relaxation Therapy, Stress, Heart Rate, Health Sciences, Psychology, Humans, Aged, Cardiovascular Reactivity, Health Psychology, Electromyography, Biofeedback, Psychology, Middle Aged, Concurrent Relaxation Training, Clinical Psychology, Nonconcurrent Relaxation Training, Hypertension, Female, Public Health, Arousal, Public Health/Gesundheitswesen
Male, Myocardial Infarction, Blood Pressure, Coronary Disease, Relaxation Therapy, Stress, Heart Rate, Health Sciences, Psychology, Humans, Aged, Cardiovascular Reactivity, Health Psychology, Electromyography, Biofeedback, Psychology, Middle Aged, Concurrent Relaxation Training, Clinical Psychology, Nonconcurrent Relaxation Training, Hypertension, Female, Public Health, Arousal, Public Health/Gesundheitswesen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
