
doi: 10.1007/bf00824261
1. The method of [1] for adjusting the instrument to a material can give a relative error of measurement more than ±2% if there is an additional signal delay. 2. The referred and relative errors may be reduced by using a standard specimen as close as possible in size to the workpiece, which serves to eliminate most of the error arising from this source in multiple measurements. 3. If limits have been specified for the refered or relative errors and values are known for δt, ri, and the speed of ultrasound, we can define limits to rmeas within which the errors in measuring the distance due to signal delay are not more than the specified values. 4. The error of measurement due to signal delay may be eliminated if not less than two echo signals are displayed on the oscilloscope during the adjustment and during direct measurement; the instrument should thus be set up from the difference of the readings corresponding to the first and n-th echo signals. These conclusions apply also to instruments of DUK-66 type, which use the same method of adjustment as the UDM-3.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
