
doi: 10.1007/bf00794841
pmid: 8456018
With the advent of echocardiography, total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) can be readily diagnosed without much difficulty. However, noninvasive detection of the presence of pulmonary venous obstruction in TAPVC remains a difficult issue. During a 5.5-year period, 42 patients were found to have TAPVC by catheterization, surgery, and/or autopsy: 17 had supracardiac drainage, 13 paracardiac drainage, nine infracardiac drainage, and three mixed drainage. Obstruction to pulmonary venous drainage was found in 24 patients (57%). Patients with right isomerism tended to have a higher incidence of pulmonary venous obstruction than those with the usual atrial arrangement (80% vs. 44%, p < 0.05). Color Doppler combined with cross-sectional echocardiography provided accurate delineation of drainage sites in 93% cases (39 of 42). Among the 39 cases with correct echocardiographic delineation of the drainage site, obstruction was detected by echocardiography in 22 cases with a sensitivity of 100% (22 of 22) and a specificity of 85% (17 of 20). Therefore, complete echocardiography, including cross-sectional images and color Doppler proved to be a reliable tool in the detection of drainage sites and pulmonary venous obstruction in TAPVC.
Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Echocardiography, Pulmonary Veins, Humans, Infant, Female, Sensitivity and Specificity, Echocardiography, Doppler, Congenital Abnormalities
Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Echocardiography, Pulmonary Veins, Humans, Infant, Female, Sensitivity and Specificity, Echocardiography, Doppler, Congenital Abnormalities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
