
There is something truly paradoxial in quantum mechanics. Physicists know well how to use it for explaining or predicting an ever-increasing harvest of phenomena, some of which are striking, even to the expert. Nevertheless, and norwithstanding the appearance, even recently, of some sedative writings by both physicsts ([1]–[6]) and philosophers ofg science, it is clear that may among the leading theorists ([7]–[9]) and the fervent epistemologists ([10]–[13]) remain unsedated by the tranquilizing sort of remedies and keep suspecting that the problem of prerly interpreting quantum mechanics may well conceal a major enigma.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
