
doi: 10.1007/bf00699299
pmid: 5998732
The study was made to assess the order of error and the sources of inaccuracy of anthropometric measurements made by a team of 9 trained observers. Some observers displayed internal inconsistencies in making the measurements, and the variability in overall means due to differences between observers were relatively large. Restricting certain observers to the instruments upon which they show consistency and additional training of these observers, or the use of control charts based on tolerance limits, estimated from “pooled” variances of intra- and inter-individual variances, or intra-individual variances alone, would reduce the present errors to more reasonable levels.
South Africa, Anthropometry, Statistics as Topic, Humans, Mathematics
South Africa, Anthropometry, Statistics as Topic, Humans, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
