
doi: 10.1007/bf00690907
pmid: 3569246
An analogue systems model of whole-body human bioenergetics predicts a change in kinetics of VO2 time series values as a result of exercise levels above an anaerobic threshold. Plotted VO2 results from exercising subjects appear to confirm this change. The purpose of this study is to describe the background to the systems model analogue of the anaerobic threshold and a test procedure devised to estimate this threshold. The estimate so obtained has the dual advantages of being based on model theory and of not being subject to the sort of ambient variations inherent in a single-test determination. A non-homogeneous group of eight subjects comprising a full replicate of a 2(3) factorial experimental design, with factors age, sex and training status, took part in the study. On one hand the results indicate acceptance of the systems model theory. On the other, the analogue threshold measure possesses corresponding properties to the conventional anaerobic threshold. It is higher for trained (155-214 W) than for untrained subjects (108-158 W), higher for males (149-214 W) than for females (108-170 W), and displays no evident interaction effects. Results for the VO2 time constant and for the work efficiency, display similar effects except for an interaction in the latter between age and training status. These experimental findings are regarded as confirmatory of the nature of the analogue threshold measure.
Adult, Male, Physical Education and Training, Respiration, Physical Exertion, Models, Biological, Kinetics, Sex Factors, Exercise Test, Humans, Female, Anaerobiosis, Energy Metabolism
Adult, Male, Physical Education and Training, Respiration, Physical Exertion, Models, Biological, Kinetics, Sex Factors, Exercise Test, Humans, Female, Anaerobiosis, Energy Metabolism
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
