
doi: 10.1007/bf00689716
pmid: 7579489
This is the first comparison of the three mucin based tests CA15-3, CASA, and MSA, and the cytokeratin-related TPS assay in breast cancer. The mucin markers were superior to TPS in receiver-operator analysis, though no marker was of use in the diagnosis of malignancy due to low sensitivity. Using cutpoints that gave 95% specificity in benign disease (n = 83), corresponding sensitivities in pre-treatment breast cancer (n = 123: 13 in situ, 54 stage I, 45 stage II, 4 stage III, 7 stage IV) were 17% (CA15-3), 16% (CASA), 13% (MSA), and 8% (TPS), with a strong relationship between marker levels and disease stage. These assays did not always detect the same patients, and the use of CA15-3 combined with CASA gave the highest sensitivity (23%), though this was not significantly better than the use of CA15-3 alone. Despite detecting similar antigens, these assays can show markedly different responses in some patients, indicating that one mucin-based test cannot be substituted for another.
Follow-Up, Assay, 610, Expression, Breast Neoplasms, Sensitivity and Specificity, Antigens, Neoplasm, 616, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Monoclonal-Antibodies, 1306 Cancer Research, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Tumors, Neoplasm Staging, Reactivity, Mucin-1, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Management, Ovarian-Carcinoma, ROC Curve, Mucin, 2730 Oncology, Female, Peptides
Follow-Up, Assay, 610, Expression, Breast Neoplasms, Sensitivity and Specificity, Antigens, Neoplasm, 616, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Monoclonal-Antibodies, 1306 Cancer Research, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Tumors, Neoplasm Staging, Reactivity, Mucin-1, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Management, Ovarian-Carcinoma, ROC Curve, Mucin, 2730 Oncology, Female, Peptides
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
