
doi: 10.1007/bf00686147
pmid: 8431968
The pharmacokinetic parameters of etoposide were established in 35 patients receiving the drug parenterally within the framework of different polychemotherapy protocols. A total of 62 data for 24-h kinetics were analysed. After sample extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) separation, etoposide was measured by means of [252Cf]-plasma desorption mass spectrometry (PDMS). This highly specific detection system proved to be very practicable and reproducible. The present study comprised two parts that were absolutely comparable in terms of clinical and pharmacokinetic parameters. In part II of the study, sensitivity was improved by modifying the analytical technique. After the exclusion of patients who had previously been given cisplatin or who exhibited renal impairment and of one patient who showed extremely high levels of alkaline phosphatase, gamma-GT and SGPT, the mean values calculated for the pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated were: beta-elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta), 4.9 +/- 1.2 h; mean residence time (MRT), 6.7 +/- 1.4 h; area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), 5.43 +/- 1.74 mg min ml-1; volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss), 6.8 +/- 2.7 l/m2; and clearance (Cl), 18.8 +/- 5.3 ml min-1 m-2. The pharmacokinetic parameters were correlated with 12 different demographic or biochemical conditions. Impaired renal function, previous application of cisplatin and the age of patients were found to influence etoposide disposition to a statistically significant extent. We suggest that the dose of etoposide should be reduced in elderly patients and/or in individuals with impaired renal function, especially in those exhibiting general risk factors such as reduced liver function with regard to the polychemotherapy.
Adult, Male, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Etoposide, Half-Life
Adult, Male, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Etoposide, Half-Life
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
