A distinction is made among consistent histories in general, and those that are robustly consistent, and finally those that are classically verifiable. In the case of an individual system, the Copenhagen view would regard only its verifiable history to have actually taken place. We analyze the consequences if instead one associates reality with a finer and yet robust history. There are distinct disadvantages. In general one should probabilistically sum over the fine-grained consistent histories, even when the events have already happened.