
doi: 10.1007/bf00636286
handle: 11245/1.427043
Determiners are the basic linguistic expressions relating predicates: ''all P1 are P2'', ''five or more P1 are P2'', ''not enough P1 are P2'', etc.. Within this class are found, in particular, both the traditional and non- standard logical quantifiers. Not all set-theoretically possible relations between predicates are actually expressible in natural language. For a start, a simple proof is presented of the Keenan \& Stavi theorem, characterizing the latter as those satisfying the mathematical condition of conservativity. Next, various additional constraints are proposed to focus on the ''logical'' determiner expressions: notably, postulates of context-neutrality and topic-neutrality (permutation invariance). Classification theorems for the remaining determiners are provided, some of them in terms of various kinds of inferential behaviour. These results are then used to evaluate certain current proposals for ''semantic universals'', i.e., broad linguistic constraints on the distribution of determiner expressions in human languages. Finally, the previous notions and results are extended to non- permutation-invariant determiners, to continuous (as opposed to the usual countable) forms of quantification - and, most generally, the enterprise is generalized so as to apply to arbitrary categories of linguistic expressions.
generalized quantifier, Logic of natural languages, Model theory, logicality, determiner, 004, semantic universal
generalized quantifier, Logic of natural languages, Model theory, logicality, determiner, 004, semantic universal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
