
doi: 10.1007/bf00593673
pmid: 7991081
The predictive value of cranial computed tomography (CT) blood load and serial transcranial Doppler sonography for the development of delayed ischaemic neurological deficit was assessed in 121 patients following subarachnoid haemorrhage. Of the 121 patients, 81 (67%) had thick layers of blood or haematoma, including intraventricular bleeding. The proportion of patients who developed delayed deficit was higher with increasing amounts of subarachnoid blood on the admission CT (51% of 53 cases in Fisher grade 3; 35% of 33 cases in grade 2; 28% of 7 cases in grade 1, P < 0.01). Doppler velocities obtained from readings at least every 2 days following admission were higher in patients with delayed neurological deficit (peak velocity for grade 3 patients 176 +/- 6 cm/s (mean +/- SE), versus grade 2: 164 +/- 7 cm/s; grade 4 149 +/- 9, both P = 0.04, Mann-Whitney). Peak velocity and maximal 24-h rise tended to be higher within different CT grades in patients with a deficit than in those without; this difference was significant for grade 3 patients (P < 0.01). We conclude that a combined approach with CT and Doppler sonography provides greater predictive value for the development of delayed ischaemic neurological deficit than either test considered independently. The value of Doppler sonography may be greatest for patients with Fisher grade 3 blood, in whom the risk of delayed ischaemia is greatest.
Adult, Male, Neurologic Examination, Blood Volume, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial, Middle Aged, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Prognosis, Brain Ischemia, Regional Blood Flow, Humans, Brain Damage, Chronic, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Blood Flow Velocity
Adult, Male, Neurologic Examination, Blood Volume, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial, Middle Aged, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Prognosis, Brain Ischemia, Regional Blood Flow, Humans, Brain Damage, Chronic, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Blood Flow Velocity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
