
The prediction of the forming limit diagram at fracture (FLDF) is of great importance, specially in cases where forming is controlled by fracture instead of necking. A physical model of coalescence is proposed in two cases of internal damage: (i) damage by decohesion of the particle matrix interface, and (ii) damage by failure of the particle. An analytical equation of the fracture curve is obtained in the case of damage by decohesion and this predicts a linear shape for the FLDF, which is in agreement with experiment. In contrast, in the case of damage by failure, a curved shape for the FLDF is obtained, which is also in agreement with experiment. Comparison of the models presented with other criteria is made.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
