
doi: 10.1007/bf00510358
pmid: 7165368
An Evaporimeter and a ventilated chamber technique have been compared in their ability to measure transepidermal water loss (TEWL) through rat skin. These techniques measure TEWL under very different conditions; the Evaporimeter measures the net TEWL under ambient relative humidity (RH) whereas the ventilated chamber employs a constant atmosphere, usually of low RH and thus measured the uni-directional diffusion of water. Paired Evaporimeter and ventilated chamber measurements were made of TEWL through normal skin and through skin whose barrier properties had been altered by tape-stripping (15 applications) or single applications of n-hexadecane (28.4 mumol cm-2). Both measuring techniques indicated the same level of TEWL through normal skin (mean 0.3 mg cm-2 h-1) and during increases in TEWL induced by n-hexadecane (max TEWL c 3.5 mg cm-2 h-1). However, the Evaporimeter was found to underestimate the higher rates of TEWL induced by tape-stripping, ie above TEWL raters of 7.5 mg cm-2 h-1. The Evaporimeter is portable, easy to use and suitable for measurements of net water loss up to 7.5 mg cm-2 h-1; it can only be used for comparative assessment of epidermal barrier function if used at a particular ambient RH. The more cumbersome ventilated chamber is to be preferred for accurate assessments of barrier function where high rates of TEWL occur.
Diffusion, Adhesives, Alkanes, Animals, Female, Rats, Inbred Strains, Water Loss, Insensible, Rats, Skin
Diffusion, Adhesives, Alkanes, Animals, Female, Rats, Inbred Strains, Water Loss, Insensible, Rats, Skin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
