
doi: 10.1007/bf00489678
pmid: 9001126
This essay argues that while we have examined clinical ethics quite extensively in the literature, too little attention has been paid to the complex question of how clinical ethics is learned. Competing approaches to ethics pedagogy have relied on outmoded understandings of the way moral learning takes place in ethics. It is argued that the better approach, framed in the work of Aristotle, is the idea of phronesis, which depends on a long-term mentorship in clinical medicine for either medical students or clinical ethics students. Such an approach is articulated and defended.
Models, Educational, Education, Medical, Professional Role, Ethics, Clinical, Ethicists, Casuistry, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Interdisciplinary Communication, Curriculum, Philosophy, Medical, Ethical Theory, Ethical Analysis
Models, Educational, Education, Medical, Professional Role, Ethics, Clinical, Ethicists, Casuistry, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Interdisciplinary Communication, Curriculum, Philosophy, Medical, Ethical Theory, Ethical Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
