
doi: 10.1007/bf00489405
pmid: 3413702
The first main purpose of this paper is to identify and to distinguish between a number of problems and conflicts of interest in the area where medical personal registers are used in research, particularly when the registers are computerized. The second main purpose is to suggest and comment upon a method for solving or minimizing such conflicts of interest.
Biomedical Research, Informed Consent, Social Values, Research Subjects, Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation, Research Design, Personal Autonomy, Ethics, Medical, Registries, Ethics Committees, Clinical, Confidentiality, Ethical Analysis, Behavioral Research, Ethics Committees, Research
Biomedical Research, Informed Consent, Social Values, Research Subjects, Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation, Research Design, Personal Autonomy, Ethics, Medical, Registries, Ethics Committees, Clinical, Confidentiality, Ethical Analysis, Behavioral Research, Ethics Committees, Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
