
Lp lipoproteins have been prepared by a mild method from the serum of a large number of individuals. Approximately 25% of the individuals tested showed the presence of a double Lp peak in analytical ultracentrifuge diagrams. These double peaks were designated Lp(a)-1 and Lp(a)-2 to distinguish them from the single Lp(a) peak. The mean viscosity-corrected sedimentation coefficient, S 1.004, 20 C and density of the single Lp(a) peak were 15.8±1.8s (n=32) and 1.076±0.01 g/ml, of the Lp(a)-1 peak were 13.5±1.1s (n=14) and 1.064±0.007 g/ml, and of the Lp(a)-2 peak were 16.8±1.7s (n=14) and 1.074±0.009 g/ml. Absorption tests using a double and single Lp preparation showed that both Lp peaks in the double variants possess Lp(a) specificity. Evidence is lacking as yet for individual specificities for either Lp(a)-1 or Lp(a)-2. Interand intra-individual heterogeneity among Lp lipoproteins is discussed.
Adult, Male, Immunodiffusion, Science, Lipoproteins, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Biochemistry, Epitopes, Health Sciences, Centrifugation, Density Gradient, Humans, Cellular and Developmental Biology, General, Molecular Biology, Viscosity, Immune Sera, Molecular, Natural Resources and Environment, Human Genetics, Middle Aged, Molecular Weight, Biomedicine, Medical Microbiology, Zoology, Ultracentrifugation
Adult, Male, Immunodiffusion, Science, Lipoproteins, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Biochemistry, Epitopes, Health Sciences, Centrifugation, Density Gradient, Humans, Cellular and Developmental Biology, General, Molecular Biology, Viscosity, Immune Sera, Molecular, Natural Resources and Environment, Human Genetics, Middle Aged, Molecular Weight, Biomedicine, Medical Microbiology, Zoology, Ultracentrifugation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
