
doi: 10.1007/bf00485546
pmid: 4690857
A review of the literature indicates that intraspecific variation among the lens proteins (crystallins) is almost invariably quantitative rather than qualitative. Lens extracts were examined from inbred strains of the laboratory mouse, rat, and guinea pig and from domestic breeds of sheep. Differences in the mobilities of protein bands after electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels were never found to be greater than the variation observed when a sample was repeatedly subjected to electrophoresis. Differences, however, were observed between widely separated populations of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). In bank voles and mice, there were variations in the intensities of bands. Electrophoresis of extracts in the presence of 6 m urea indicated that there were no major differences between six mouse strains in the subunits constituting their α- and β-crystallins. More detailed examination of α-crystallins from two mouse strains by isoelectric focusing and amino acid analysis supported this conclusion.
Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C3H, Sheep, Guinea Pigs, Mice, Inbred Strains, Rats, Inbred Strains, Rodentia, Crystallins, Rats, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Species Specificity, Mice, Inbred CBA, Animals, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Amino Acids, Isoelectric Focusing
Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C3H, Sheep, Guinea Pigs, Mice, Inbred Strains, Rats, Inbred Strains, Rodentia, Crystallins, Rats, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Species Specificity, Mice, Inbred CBA, Animals, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Amino Acids, Isoelectric Focusing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
