
doi: 10.1007/bf00452885
The paper presents a new characterisation result of generalized Condorcet Winner (CW) mechanisms based upon Nash's and Arrow's versions of the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives. (Theorem 1). In the definition of a CW mechanism a certain number of fixed ballots (one less than the number of agents) are the only endogenous parameters. Theorem 2 shows how these parameters may be chosen when the size of society varies. Next (Theorem 3), the domain of definition of individual preferences is extended to cover single plateau preferences and once more, the CW mechanisms are characterised by the two axioms of independence of irrelevant alternatives. Finally (Theorem 4) shows that no further extension of the preference domain is compatible with both the axioms.
Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives, anonymity, coalitionally strategy proof choice, efficiency, Social choice, generalized Condorcet Winner, CW mechanism, Individual preferences
Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives, anonymity, coalitionally strategy proof choice, efficiency, Social choice, generalized Condorcet Winner, CW mechanism, Individual preferences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
