<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Efficacy in dysphagia

Name: Efficacy in dysphagia
Creator: John C. Rosenbek
Keywords: Clinical Trials as Topic, 03 medical and health sciences, Treatment Outcome, 0302 clinical medicine, Behavior Therapy, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Deglutition Disorders, 0305 other medical science, 3. Good health

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 1995 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Dysphagia, volume 10, pages 263-267 (issn: 0179-051X, eissn: 1432-0460,

Authors: John C. Rosenbek;

doi: 10.1007/bf00431420

pmid: 7493508

Efficacy in dysphagia

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Data demonstrating the efficacy of behavioral methods for treating dysphagia are in short supply. This paper defines efficacy and distinguishes it from efficiency. It highlights the attitudes, measures, decisions, and data essential to the design of clinical trials. The need for additional outcome measures and for establishing appropriate treatment intensities are emphasized.

Related Organizations

William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital
United States

Keywords

Clinical Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Behavior Therapy, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Deglutition Disorders

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	25
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average