
doi: 10.1007/bf00426891
pmid: 418457
Rats were trained in a shuttle-box to emit shuttle response (SBs) to a 5-s buzzer using three different routines: (1) classical conditioning (DP test), in which the buzzer was followed immediately by 1.5 mA foot-shocks on all trials regardless of responses; (2) an avoidance paradigm without stimulus pairing (DC test), in which the buzzer-shock interval was varied at random between 5 and 35 s on each trial, but in which each SB cancelled the next scheduled shock (avoidance contingency); (3) a typical two-way avoidance situation (DPC test), in which the stimuli were paired on every trial, as in DP, but in which each SB cancelled the next shock, as in DC. In all tests the intertrial interval ranged between 10 and 40 s, and sessions consisted of 50 trials.
Male, Nicotine, Dextroamphetamine, Time Factors, Conditioning, Classical, Brain, Rats, Memory, Avoidance Learning, Animals, Female
Male, Nicotine, Dextroamphetamine, Time Factors, Conditioning, Classical, Brain, Rats, Memory, Avoidance Learning, Animals, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
