A number of differences in the responses of 'Great Lakes' lettuce seedlings to blue and far-red light indicate that more than one photo-sensitive pigment is involved in the photo-inhibition of hypocotyl elongation under 'highenergy' conditions. In far-red light the inhibitory effect is restricted to young seedlings and is of limited duration; after 24 hours in far-red a rapid growth rate similar to that of plants maintained in darkness is resumed, despite continued irradiation. The onset of inhibition is relatively slow. Blue light, in contrast, exerts a strongly inhibitory effect on elongation at any age, and a slow rate of growth persists throughout the entire irradiation period. The onset of inhibition is very rapid. Furthermore, even when the inhibition in far-red had already been exhausted after prolonged exposure, transfer to blue light resulted in a prompt reduction in growth rate. Also the effect of far-red is almost completely lost after a pre-irradiation with red light which does not affect the response to blue. It is concluded that the responses to blue and far-red light in 'Great Lakes' lettuce are not mediated by a single pigment system and that a distinct blue-sensitive pigment is present in addition to phytochrome. Red light has a number of different effects depending on conditions: (1) a pretreatment with red light almost completely prevents the inhibitory effect of a subsequent far-red irradiation, (2) a brief terminal treatment with red increases the inhibitory effect of either far-red or blue light; this is reversed by far-red, and (3) prolonged exposure to red light given alone increases the growth rate relative to darkness, because the more rapid elongation rate characteristic of young seedlings continues for longer with red light than in plants grown in darkness throughout.