
doi: 10.1007/bf00394313
pmid: 313183
193 Haemophilus cultures, including 71 nontypable H. influenzae isolates, were examined with respect to phage HP1 sensitivity, lysogeny for this and for other phages and for excretion of bacteriocins. Fifty of the 71 nontypable cultures were sensitive to phage HP1 but only three produced plaques. The other 47 isolates were thus probably not non-encapsulated derivatives of H. influenzae serotypes a, b, d, and e, which have discrete and characteristic phage HP1 restriction and modification systems, or serotype c which appears to be restriction negative. They could be derivatives of serotype f which does not give plaques with phage HP1. The nontypable three cultures that plated phage HP1 efficiently could be non-encapsulated serotype c derivatives. Fourteen of the phage HP1 insentitive non-typable cultures were found to be defectively lysogenic for this phage. Five of these were genetically transformed to wild type lysogens. Their phage produced plaques efficiently only on Rc strains and on a restriction-negative mutant of serotype d. These lysogenic nontypable isolates are thus modification (and restriction) negative and they are thus probably not nonencapsulated derivatives of serotypes a, b, d, e, or f. Fifty three of 56 serotype b cultures were found to excrete a bacteriocin, to which all other nonproducing Haemophilus cultures were more or less sensitive. The three restriction-negative nontypable H. influenzae cultures also excreted this bacteriocin but the other cultures listed did not do this. The tentative conclusion from this study is that nontypable H. influenzae isolates are probably not derivatives of the six known encapsulated strains.
Haemophilus Infections, Bacteriocins, Defective Viruses, Humans, Bacteriophages, Bacteriophage Typing, Haemophilus influenzae, Lysogeny
Haemophilus Infections, Bacteriocins, Defective Viruses, Humans, Bacteriophages, Bacteriophage Typing, Haemophilus influenzae, Lysogeny
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
