
doi: 10.1007/bf00390033
pmid: 3624298
Studies of occupational cancer are particularly significant for primary prevention of cancer. Firstly, most cancers, once identified, can be prevented by reasonably simple means, without impinging on personal freedom. Secondly, the prevention of occupational cancers represents a saving of lives and the elimination of illness during the most active period of the lifespan. A third reason for investigating occupational cancers is that, in some cases, workers represent a particularly heavily exposed subgroup, and the occupational setting thus serves as a laboratory for the general environment. The protection of human health in the workplace should not depend solely on the epidemiological demonstration of existing risks; it is essential that results of predictive toxicology from long- and short-term laboratory studies also be used in the identification of possible carcinogenic risk factors.
Occupational Diseases, Risk, Cocarcinogenesis, Neoplasms, Carcinogens, Humans, Industry, Epidemiologic Methods, Toxicology, Models, Biological
Occupational Diseases, Risk, Cocarcinogenesis, Neoplasms, Carcinogens, Humans, Industry, Epidemiologic Methods, Toxicology, Models, Biological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
