
doi: 10.1007/bf00385664
pmid: 3428314
In two experiments the hypothesis was tested that left hemisphere-damaged patients and especially those with aphasia are impaired in the recognition of meaningless random shapes because they fail to attribute a meaning to the shapes. In a multiple choice recognition task, left hemisphere-damaged patients with aphasia and left and right hemisphere-damaged patients without aphasia were shown complex random shapes together with either a pictorial cue (experiment I and II) or a dotted drawing of its outline on which more or less outstanding parts were specially marked (experiment I). In experiment I no difference between conditions or groups emerged. In experiment II aphasics and left hemisphere-damaged patients without aphasia were generally inferior to right hemisphere-damaged controls and performed significantly better when a pictorial cue was given than when it was absent, however only when the conditions were given in a certain order.
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Functional Laterality, Form Perception, Memory, Aphasia, Humans, Brain Damage, Chronic, Female, Cues, Aged
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Functional Laterality, Form Perception, Memory, Aphasia, Humans, Brain Damage, Chronic, Female, Cues, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
