
doi: 10.1007/bf00384266
pmid: 28310887
We briefly review current methods for detecting nonrandom patterns in the temporal overlap of flowering and fruiting curves. We discuss the assumptions behind these methods and propose a new method of analysis using computer simulations to measure n-wise, rather than pairwise, temporal overlap. We quantify the extent to which observed n-wise overlap differs from minimum possible n-wise overlap and apply our method to several data sets to test the hypothesis that interspecific competition for animal visitors has produced flowering curves whose overlap is less than that expected by chance. Results of our analyses provide little support for this hypothesis but suggest alternate criteria by which the species may be selected.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
