Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Chromosomaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Chromosoma
Article . 1964 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Studies on a triploid, a tetrasomic triploid and a trisomic plant of Dactylis glomerata

Authors: S. S. Shah;

Studies on a triploid, a tetrasomic triploid and a trisomic plant of Dactylis glomerata

Abstract

1. From 4 n×2 n and reciprocal crosses within Dactylis glomerata subsp. lusitanica and D.g. subsp. smithii and between these two subspecies, two triploids, two polyhaploids and a 3n+1 plant were obtained. The two subspecies differ considerably as regards the extent of crossability with respect to intrasubspecific 2n×4n and recriprocal crosses. 2. The cytology of the triploid Dg(1 x sm) 933-III-6 and the 3n+1 plant Dgl 936-I-6 was studied. Chiasma frequency and multivalent frequency per chromosome for these two plants was compared. The frequency distribution for trivalents in the Dg (1 x sm) 933-III-6 plant was compared with the expected binomial distribution. There was a good fit. Data show no evidence for structural differentiation between the two subspecies. 3. In the triploid plant, at anaphase I the distribution of chromosomes did not deviate significantly from a binomial distribution. 4. The triploid and 3n+1 plant had nearly 28% pollen fertility. The 3n+1 plant had significantly higher variance for pollen grain size than the diploid lusitanica plant. 5. From crosses of an asynaptic plant with a normal diploid a primary trisomic plant was obtained. Cytology of the trisomic was studied. In nearly half of the PMCs a trivalent was formed.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!