
doi: 10.1007/bf00357107
pmid: 3321461
In order to evaluate ultrasonography in patients with suspected hip joint effusions, 123 consecutive patients were examined prospectively. Twenty healthy subjects were used as a control group. The normal sonoanatomy, the recommended scanning approach, and the diagnostic features of intra-articular joint effusions are presented. Even minor fluid collections of 1 or 2 ml could be accurately detected. Transient synovitis and fresh hemorrhagic effusions proved to be echofree, whereas clotted hemorrhagic collections or septic arthritis showed non-echofree effusions. Based on intraoperative and computed tomography (CT) data, ultrasonography is clearly superior to X-ray films in detecting joint effusions. A negative sonogram will exclude a fluid collection; the depiction of an echofree effusion will virtually rule out septic arthritis. The use of additional imaging techniques can be reduced greatly, as ultrasonography seems to be an improved method for the early diagnosis of septic arthritis.
Adult, Hydrarthrosis, Arthritis, Infectious, Synovitis, Adolescent, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Middle Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Child, Preschool, Epiphyses, Slipped, Humans, Hip Joint, Prospective Studies, Child, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Ultrasonography
Adult, Hydrarthrosis, Arthritis, Infectious, Synovitis, Adolescent, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Middle Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Child, Preschool, Epiphyses, Slipped, Humans, Hip Joint, Prospective Studies, Child, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 85 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
