Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Supportive Care in C...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Supportive Care in Cancer
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Bone marrow transplantation today

Authors: A, Gratwohl;

Bone marrow transplantation today

Abstract

Today, bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is an established therapy. This statement is best verified by the number of BMTs performed. Between January 1990 and December 1992, 172 European teams in 26 countries carried out a total of 14,334 transplants. There were 6642 allogeneic transplants: 5513 BMT from an HLA-identical sibling donor, 370 from a non-identical family member, 88 from an identical twin donor and 671 from an unrelated volunteer donor. There were 7692 autologous transplants: 6577 autologous bone marrow, 777 peripheral-blood stem-cell and 338 combined bone-marrow and peripheral-blood stem-cell transplants. Indications were: leukaemias in 52% (7479), lymphoproliferative disorders in 29% (4125), solid tumours in 11% (1540), aplastic anaemia and thalassaemia in 3% (487) and inborn errors an miscellaneous disorders in the remaining 5% (703). The results of these transplants are not yet known. From previous analyses it can be expected that more than 50% of patients will be alive and well 10 years after BMT. The main factors influencing outcome are known; they depend on type, sub-type, stage of disease at time of transplant, the time from diagnosis to transplant and the conditioning regimen for all transplants. For allogeneic BMT, donor source, donor and recipient age, sex, donor/recipient sex combination, donor and recipient viral status, graft-versus-host disease prevention method and region are additional factors. Knowledge of these factors enables us today to estimate the potential risk and adjust the therapy for an individual patient.

Keywords

Databases, Factual, Tissue Donors, Europe, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Population Surveillance, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Health Services Research, Registries, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!