
doi: 10.1007/bf00345538
pmid: 28309865
The general conclusion of this paper is that heteromyids do not select seed sizes on the basis of their body size. My conclusion comes from the analysis of new data from central New Mexico, analysis of data in the literature on food habits of heteromyids, and a reanalysis of Brown and Lieberman (1973) and Brown (1975). All of these sources agree that no seed size selection exists.Although no pattern of simple seed size selection was found, interesting differences were noticed among species. First, the tendency to husk appears to be related to the size of the rodent. Second, large heteromyids may depend on fruiting heads made up of small seeds. This may or may not have significance to the coexistece of heteromyid communities. At present, insufficient data are available to make conclusions along these lines.Intuitively satisfying hypotheses, such as seed size allocation by heteromyids, are normally very hard to lay to rest. It is my hope that this paper demonstrates the weight of evidece is against seed size allocation in heteromyids. Those who wish to maintain this hypothesis, or reveal that it or related hypotheses have anything to do with heteromyid coexistence, must now produce data to support their position.
Natural Resources and Conservation
Natural Resources and Conservation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
