
doi: 10.1007/bf00337433
pmid: 518934
Statistically optimal methods for identifying single unit activity in multiple unit recordings are discussed. These methods take into account both the nerve impulse waveforms and the firing patterns of the units. A generalized least-squares fit procedure is shown to be the optimal recognition scheme under some reasonable statistical assumptions, but the amount of computation becomes prohibitively large when the method is applied to the problem of sorting superimposed waveforms. A linear filter technique which relies on simultaneous recording from several electrodes is shown to give good separation of superimposed waveforms. An iterative recognition procedure can be applied to improve the results and reduce the number of recording electrodes required.
Estimation and detection in stochastic control theory, Statistics as Topic, Neural Conduction, Physiological, cellular and medical topics, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Filtering in stochastic control theory, Inference from stochastic processes and prediction, Electrophysiology, Identifying Single Unit Activity, Generalized Least- Squares Fit Procedure, Animals, Nerve Impulse Waveforms, Firing Patterns, Optimal Recognition of Neuronal Waveforms, Linear Filter Technique
Estimation and detection in stochastic control theory, Statistics as Topic, Neural Conduction, Physiological, cellular and medical topics, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Filtering in stochastic control theory, Inference from stochastic processes and prediction, Electrophysiology, Identifying Single Unit Activity, Generalized Least- Squares Fit Procedure, Animals, Nerve Impulse Waveforms, Firing Patterns, Optimal Recognition of Neuronal Waveforms, Linear Filter Technique
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
