
doi: 10.1007/bf00332387
pmid: 5123871
In general, mutations have a negative effect on man. Considering the great number of substances inducing mutagenic effects in microorganisms and in cell cultures, the question arises whether these substances are a genetic risk for man, too. Final statements concerning this matter should be based on in vivo investigations which fully take into account the mammalian and/or human metabolism. On the other hand, the additional costs of routine mutagenicity screening should have no inhibitory effect on the development of new drugs and other important substances. On the basis of these considerations, this paper deals with methods suitable for being incorporated into routine in vivo mutagenicity testing in mammals.
Chromosome Aberrations, Male, Time Factors, Bone Marrow Cells, Chromosome Disorders, Rodentia, Rats, Mice, Bone Marrow, Cricetinae, Karyotyping, Methods, Animals, Female, Lymphocytes, Mutagens, Nitrosoguanidines
Chromosome Aberrations, Male, Time Factors, Bone Marrow Cells, Chromosome Disorders, Rodentia, Rats, Mice, Bone Marrow, Cricetinae, Karyotyping, Methods, Animals, Female, Lymphocytes, Mutagens, Nitrosoguanidines
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
