
doi: 10.1007/bf00328273
pmid: 7196829
Electron microscopy has been used to study the fine structural organization of R-banded chromosomes prepared by treatment of the chromosomes with a hot NaH2PO4 solution. The results indicate that there is a structural basis for R-banding with this technique. In comparison to untreated control chromosomes, the R-banded chromosomes had a greatly reduced electron density, suggesting that the heat treatment has a general adverse effect on chromosome structure. Chromatin fibers formed a coarse, irregular network throughout the chromosome and were often enlarged, probably as a result of the fusion of two or more native fibers. The chromatin fibers were more aggregated and had an increased electron density in the R-band regions of the chromosome than in the interbands. This indicates that the treatment has a differential effect on the structure of bands and interbands. A comparison of the ultrastructure of R- and G-banded chromosomes demonstrated that the distribution of aggregated chromatin was reversed by these two types of banding techniques; however, the treatments producing the R-banding appeared to induce less extreme differences in the degree of chromatin condensation in band and interband regions than those giving rise to G-banding. It is suggested that alterations of DNA-protein interactions may arise from the differential denaturation of proteins and/or DNA in R-band and interband regions during the heat pretreatment. Such differential alterations in DNA-protein interactions may induce localized changes in the organization of chromatin and may account for the subtle morphological differences observed between the band and interband regions.
Ovary, Azure Stains, Chromatin, Chromosomes, Cell Line, Chromosome Banding, Microscopy, Electron, Cricetulus, Cricetinae, Animals, Female
Ovary, Azure Stains, Chromatin, Chromosomes, Cell Line, Chromosome Banding, Microscopy, Electron, Cricetulus, Cricetinae, Animals, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
