Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao World Journal of Sur...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
World Journal of Surgery
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Pathology and prognosis

Authors: H, Ide; T, Nakamura; K, Hayashi; T, Endo; A, Kobayashi; R, Eguchi; F, Hanyu;

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Pathology and prognosis

Abstract

AbstractBetween 1985 and 1992 a total of 403 patients with resected thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were evaluated histopathologically, and various pathologic findings related to survival were examined. Concerning depth of tumor invasion, 8 (2%) cases were pTis, 110 (27%) were pT1, 48 (12%) were pT2, 202 (50%) were pT3, and 35 (9%) were pT4. Lymphatic invasion was detected in 299 cases (74%), blood vessel invasion in 200 cases (49%), intramural metastasis in 45 (11%), and lymph node metastasis in 232 (58%). In pT1 carcinoma cases, 4% of mucosal carcinomas and 30% of submucosal carcinomas had lymph node metastasis. Tumors with deeper invasion had a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis: 74% of pT3 carcinomas and 83% of pT4 carcinomas. The sites of lymph node metastasis were divided into mediastinal, cervical, and abdominal fields; and rates of lymph node metastasis were 49%, 14%, and 41%, respectively. In all resected cases, the operative mortality rate was 3.2%, and the overall 5‐year survival rate was 44.8%. The 5‐year survival rate of patients with curative resection (R0and R1) was 49.5%, whereas patients with palliative resection (R2) did not survive more than 3 years. There was no significant difference in survival relative to tumor location. In curatively resected cases, the significant prognostic factors by multivariate analysis were pT category, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and intramural metastasis. Prognosis of lymph node‐positive cases did not depend on the positive node site. Patients with only one positive node had a better prognosis, and those with six or more positive nodes had a poor prognosis. Concerning lymph node metastasis, other factors that worsened prognosis were a positive node larger than 1 cm, two‐ to three‐field metastasis, and positive cervical nodes in cases of lower‐third esophageal carcinoma.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Esophageal Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Lymphatic Metastasis, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    116
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
116
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!