
doi: 10.1007/bf00309727
16 Ss read aloud affirmative and negative sentences presented in a sentence memory task. While reading each sentence, they performed either an associative or a dissociative manual task (putting two halves of a square together or taking them apart). Following presentation of a block of 8 sentences the Ss were given the sentence subjects as prompts and told to recall their predicates. Analysis of variance for recall errors showed, as predicted, an interaction between sentence mode (affirmative vs. negative) and manual action mode (associative vs. dissociative): Affirmative sentences were better recalled when their presentation had been paired with associative manual action, negative sentences when their presentation had been with dissociative manual action. This finding is interpreted within a model of sentence use which emphasizes a general constructive component.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
