Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Zeitschrift für Kreb...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Zeitschrift für Krebsforschung und Klinische Onkologie
Article . 1977 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Repressible and inducible enzymic forms of dimethylnitrosamine-demethylase

Authors: J C, Arcos; D L, Davies; C E, Brown; M F, Argus;

Repressible and inducible enzymic forms of dimethylnitrosamine-demethylase

Abstract

Two enzymic forms, with different kinetic characteristics and responding in opposite ways to in vivo “enzyme inducer” pretreatment, underlie hepatic dimethylnitrosamine(DMN)-demethylase activity. Determination of the Hofstee plot of DMN-demethylase using a DMN substrate concentration range of 0.5 to 200 mM yields three intersecting line segments from which widely different Km and Vmax values may be calculated. Identically patterned Hofstee plots are obtained with rat and mouse postmitochondrial supernatant fractions, as well as with the isolated microsomes, yielding for the respective segments, similar Km values. The low-substrate-range line segment (0–4 mM) and the high-substrate-range line segment (50–200 mM) correspond, in both the rat and the mouse, to two different enzymic forms of DMN-demethylase (DMN-demethylase I and II, respectively) which have different regulatory characteristics: (A) Pretreatment of rats and mice with the polychlorinated biphenyl, Aroclor 1254, brings about repression of DMN-demethylase I (determined at 4 mM DMN) and induction of DMN-demethylase II (determined at 200 mM DMN); both responses are stronger in the rat than in the mouse. Kinetic experiments show that the differential responses of the two DMN-demethylases to Aroclor pretreatment are paralleled by corresponding changes in the Vmax values. (B) Pretreatment with phenobarbital represses enzyme I in both species; however, it induces enzyme II only in the rat. (C) Pretreatment with 3-methylcholanthrene substantially represses DMN-demethylase I in the rat; however, it is ineffective to significantly influence the activity of enzymic form II in the rat and of either enzymic form in the mouse. There is no evidence that the intermediate line segment would correspond to an additional enzymic form. The genetically distinct nature of the two forms of hepatic DMN-demethylase is suggested by the substantial differences in the strain-dependence of the repressibility of enzyme I and inducibility of enzyme II in a series of 9 inbred strains of mice. The mouse lung contains only the inducible-type of DMN-demethylase; however, the ranking of inducibilities is different from the hepatic enzyme II. Beyond about 300 mM further increase of DMN concentration in the assay system brings about progressive decrease of DMN-demethylase activity owing probably to the protein denaturing ability of DMN at high concentrations.

Keywords

Nitrosamines, Oxidoreductases, N-Demethylating, Dimethylnitrosamine, Rats, Mice, Structure-Activity Relationship, Liver, Enzyme Induction, Phenobarbital, Animals, Humans, Enzyme Repression, Methylcholanthrene

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    120
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
120
Average
Top 1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!