
We analysed 13 cases of lumbar disc infection following surgical discectomy. Two groups of patients were identified. The six patients in group A reported that the initial symptoms of discitis had appeared a mean of 15 days after surgery; on average, antibiotic treatment was started 31 days following operation and continued for 62 days, and symptoms regressed after 3.9 months. Four patients showed moderate changes, while two had extensive osteolytic lesions of one or both vertebral bodies adjacent to the involved disc. In the 7 cases in group B, discitis was suspected a mean of 5 days and antibiotics were initiated a mean of 8 days following surgery; on average, symptoms regressed 1.8 months after operation. Only four patients showed vertebral radiographic changes and none had marked destructive lesions. In both groups erythrocyte sedimentation rate exceeded 70 mm/h in cases in which discitis was suspected. Tomograms and magnetic resonance studies were the most diagnostic imaging studies in the initial stages of the disease. All patients obtained satisfactory clinical results at the last follow-up. Careful observation of the early postoperative clinical course usually allows detection of disc space infection. Early and adequately prolonged antibiotic treatment may shorten the course of the disease and avoid extensive osteolytic vertebral lesions.
Adult, Male, Discitis, Lumbar Vertebrae, Middle Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Treatment Outcome, Humans, disc infection; discectomy; intervertebral disc; intervertebral disc - discectomy - disc infection, Female, Postoperative Period, Intervertebral Disc, Low Back Pain, Bed Rest, Aged, Diskectomy, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Discitis, Lumbar Vertebrae, Middle Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Treatment Outcome, Humans, disc infection; discectomy; intervertebral disc; intervertebral disc - discectomy - disc infection, Female, Postoperative Period, Intervertebral Disc, Low Back Pain, Bed Rest, Aged, Diskectomy, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
