
doi: 10.1007/bf00293659
pmid: 578710
Everyone involved in planning and carrying out biological experiments has to concern himself with statistical methods. Thus, descriptive statistics (e. g. calculation of the mean) help to present results briefly and comprehensively and, in addition, statistical test procedures permit decisions to be made even in an uncertain situation. The choice of the appropriate statistical procedure is, however, associated with considerable problems. These problems are discussed in detail using the dominant lethal test as an example. Means of solving the problems with the necessary consequences for planning of the experiment and its evaluation are discussed and practical recommendations are given applying also to other mutagenicity tests.
Male, Models, Biological, Mice, Research Design, Fertilization, Mutation, Animals, Female, Genes, Lethal, Genes, Dominant, Mutagens
Male, Models, Biological, Mice, Research Design, Fertilization, Mutation, Animals, Female, Genes, Lethal, Genes, Dominant, Mutagens
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
