Contests involving territorial male rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) occur frequently over the course of the breeding season. Fights are initiated when one male (Neighbour or Bachelor) intrudes on another's (Resident) territory. These contests involved two kinds of asymmetries: Neighbours were similar to Residents in mating status, size and experience, differing only in the gains accrued from winning a fight (payoff asymmetry) whereas Bachelors were smaller, less experienced males that had no mate or territory (fighting asymmetry, in addition to a relatively larger payoff asymmetry than in Resident x Neighbour contests). In this study, we describe and compare the contests resulting from these intrusions, and we assess how the asymmetries (fighting ability, payoffs) between opponents influenced contest intensity. Resident x Neighbour contests were brief, highly-ritualized affairs, while Resident x Bachelor interactions were long, intense battles, often ending in direct physical attack. These findings are in direct opposition to many theoretical and empirical studies on fighting asymmetries which suggest that contest intensity should be negatively correlated with the degree of fighting asymmetry between contestants. Since the potential losses associated with a contest differed between contestants and were highest for an intruding Neighbour, we conclude that payoff asymmetries were more important than fighting asymmetries in influencing a male's tendency to escalate.