
doi: 10.1007/bf00267229
pmid: 6929947
The use of heteroduplex DNA molecules as donors in pneumococcal transformation makes it possible to follow the fate of each DNA strand. The integration efficiency of each strand depends strongly upon the single base changes it carries. The function (hex) which reduces drastically the transformation yield of markers referred to as low efficiency (LE) tends to remove either donor strand without respect ot which one is introduced. In the case of high efficiency (HE) markers the reduction in the transformation yield involves the elimination of only one donor strand. For a given locus it can be either one depending upon the mutation. The reduction in transformation yield can be less drastic for HE markers than for both strands of the LE markers. These data are discussed in terms of differences in the affinity for mismatched base pairs. We have studied the transfer of information from each donor DNA strand to the recipient genome, on the basis of differences in the rates of phenotypic expression of a given marker introduced on opposite strands. Results show that, as in the case of LE markers, the information from HE markers, when introduced on the strand recognized by the hex function, is transmitted to both strands of the recipient molecule. Correction of the recipient strand to homozygosis probably accounts for this information transfer. These results, together with earlier investigations, strongly suggest that the hex function is an excision-repair system acting on donor-recipient base pair mismatches.
DNA, Bacterial, Genetic Markers, Recombination, Genetic, Phenotype, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Base Sequence, DNA Repair, Genotype, Transformation, Bacterial
DNA, Bacterial, Genetic Markers, Recombination, Genetic, Phenotype, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Base Sequence, DNA Repair, Genotype, Transformation, Bacterial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 58 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
