
doi: 10.1007/bf00252942
pmid: 6653601
A reliable subjective method of assessing bone scan quality is described. A large number of variables which theoretically could influence scan quality were submitted to regression and factor analysis. Obesity, age, sex and abnormality of scan were found to be significant but weak variables.
Male, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Radionuclide Imaging, Bone and Bones
Male, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Radionuclide Imaging, Bone and Bones
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
