
doi: 10.1007/bf00229860
pmid: 7621928
The aim of the present study was to determine whether normal subjects with one eye covered and patients in whom one eye had been enucleated generate more head movements than subjects using binocular vision during the performance of a visually guided grasping movement. In experiment 1, 14 right-handed normal subjects were tested binocularly and monocularly in a task in which they were required to reach out and grasp oblong blocks of different sizes at different distances. Although the typical binocular advantage in reaching and grasping was observed, the overall head movement scores did not differ between these testing conditions. In experiment 2, seven right-handed enucleated patients were compared to seven age and sex-matched control subjects (tested under binocular and monocular viewing conditions), on the same task as used in experiment 1. While no differences were found in the kinematics of reaches produced by the enucleated patients and the control subjects, the patients did produce larger and faster resultant head movements, composed mainly of lateral and vertical movements. This suggests that enucleated patients may be generating more head movements in order to better utilize retinal motion cues to aid in manual prehension.
Adult, Male, Depth Perception, Vision, Binocular, Movement, Adaptation, Physiological, Functional Laterality, Vision, Monocular, Humans, Female, Cues, Head, Ocular Physiological Phenomena, Photic Stimulation
Adult, Male, Depth Perception, Vision, Binocular, Movement, Adaptation, Physiological, Functional Laterality, Vision, Monocular, Humans, Female, Cues, Head, Ocular Physiological Phenomena, Photic Stimulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 60 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
