
doi: 10.1007/bf00226869
pmid: 24226570
High-density restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and allozyme linkage maps have been developed in several plant species. These maps make it technically feasible to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) using methods based on flanking marker genetic models. In this paper, we describe flanking marker models for doubled haploid (DH), recombinant inbred (RI), backcross (BC), F1 testcross (F1TC), DH testcross (DHTC), recombinant inbred testcross (RITC), F2, and F3 progeny. These models are functions of the means of quantitative trait locus genotypes and recombination frequencies between marker and quantitative trait loci. In addition to the genetic models, we describe maximum likelihood methods for estimating these parameters using linear, nonlinear, and univariate or multivariate normal distribution mixture models. We defined recombination frequency estimators for backcross and F2 progeny group genetic models using the parameters of linear models. In addition, we found a genetically unbiased estimator of the QTL heterozygote mean using a linear function of marker means. In nonlinear models, recombination frequencies are estimated less efficiently than the means of quantitative trait locus genotypes. Recombination frequency estimation efficiency decreases as the distance between markers decreases, because the number of progeny in recombinant marker classes decreases. Mean estimation efficiency is nearly equal for these methods.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 88 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
