
doi: 10.1007/bf00223081
pmid: 7824978
In order to determine the reliability of the Cobb angle measurement as it is used in the clinical management of scoliosis, a methodological survey was carried out. In the measurement of a Cobb angle two phases can be distinguished: (a) the production of a spinal radiograph and (b) the measurement of the angle itself. In respect of the first phase, the variation in production of the radiographs was calculated on Cobb angle measurements made by one investigator on serial radiographs of patients who underwent spinal fusion for scoliosis and therefore had a fixed spinal curvature. For the second phase, the accuracy of Cobb angle measurement was investigated by comparing measurements on the same radiographs of 46 scoliosis patients obtained by three investigators, namely two orthopaedic surgeons and an orthopaedic fellow who was assigned to a school screening project. Results were expressed as a Spearman correlation coefficient and a standard deviation of the differences. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.98 for the repeated radiographs (production variation) and also 0.98 for the repeated measurements on one radiograph (interobserver measurement variation). The standard deviation of the differences in Cobb angle for the repeated radiographs amounted to 3.2 degrees and for the repeated measurements on one radiograph it was 2.0 degrees. Although there is a good reproducibility of the Cobb angle measurement between different investigators, the variation in production of a spinal radiograph is an important source of error. This should be taken into account when making decisions in scoliosis management.
Observer Variation, Radiography, Scoliosis, Humans, Spine
Observer Variation, Radiography, Scoliosis, Humans, Spine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 151 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
