
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1007/bf00220958
pmid: 24169915
The theoretical effect of simultaneous selection on the genetic correlations between two traits over 20 generations was examined using simulation. For each generation, a population of 50 male and 50 female diploid gen otypes with 15 loci, each with two alleles, was synthesized. None of the loci exhibited dominance. Five loci affected only trait 1, 5 loci only trait 2 and 5 were pleiotropic (affected both traits). Initial allelic frequencies were equal at each locus. Phenotypes were created by adding a random normal deviation for each trait to the genotype. The size of this deviation for each trait determined its heritability (h(2)). Index selection with h(2) combinations of (0.15, 0.15), (0.15,0.45) and (0.45,0.45) and relative economic weights of (1, 1) and (1, 3) for each h(2) combination was employed. In each generation, the highest ranking 25 genotypes of each sex were used to generate the next generation with single-pair matings, each producing two male and two female offspring. One hundred replicates were run for both negative and positive correlations. With a positive initial value, the genetic correlation tended to decline (toward zero). The rates of change were moderately affected by index weights and h(2). With a negative initial value, the genetic correlation tended to decrease (towards -1). However, unequal heritabilities and unequal relative economic weights slowed the rate of change with the greatest imbalances tending to hold the correlation constant or move it toward zero. These simulations illustrate that changes in parameters over time can affect the selection practiced. Under some of the conditions simulated, the use of initial genetic parameter values without change could have potentially negative effects on overall genetic gain.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
