
pmid: 7703300
In motion-processing areas of the visual cortex in cats and monkeys, an anisotropic distribution of direction selectivities displays a preference for movements away from the fovea. This 'centrifugal bias' has been hypothetically linked to the processing of optic flow fields generated during forward locomotion. In this paper, we show that flow fields induced on the retina in many natural situations of locomotion of higher mammals are indeed qualitatively centrifugal in structure, even when biologically plausible eye movements to stabilize gaze on environmental targets are performed. We propose a network model of heading detection that carries an anisotropy similar to the one found in cat and monkey. In simulations, this model reproduces a number of psychophysical results of human heading detection. It suggests that a recently reported human disability to correctly identify the direction of heading from optic flow when a certain type of eye movement is simulated might be linked to the noncentrifugal structure of the resulting retinal flow field and to the neurophysiological anisotropies.
retina, Psychophysics and psychophysiology; perception, Eye Movements, optic flow fields, Models, Neurological, Motion Perception, Retina, Neural biology, Animals, Humans, Visual Pathways, visual cortex, network model of heading detection, Haplorhini, Cats, Anisotropy, simulations, Neural Networks, Computer, Visual Fields, anisotropic distribution of direction selectivities, neurophysiological anisotropies, centrifugal bias, locomotion of higher mammals, Algorithms
retina, Psychophysics and psychophysiology; perception, Eye Movements, optic flow fields, Models, Neurological, Motion Perception, Retina, Neural biology, Animals, Humans, Visual Pathways, visual cortex, network model of heading detection, Haplorhini, Cats, Anisotropy, simulations, Neural Networks, Computer, Visual Fields, anisotropic distribution of direction selectivities, neurophysiological anisotropies, centrifugal bias, locomotion of higher mammals, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
