
doi: 10.1007/bf00187678
pmid: 8934139
Trauma to the chest may cause a wide range of injuries including fractures of the thoracic skeleton, contusion or laceration of pulmonary parenchyma, damage to the tracheobronchial tree, diaphragmatic rupture or cardiac contusion. Conditions affecting primarily extrathoracic sites may have indirect effects on the lungs causing adult respiratory distress syndrome or fat embolism. Laceration of the aorta is the typical and likewise most life threatening complication of massive blunt chest trauma necessitating immediate diagnosis and repair. Conventional radiography rather than cross-sectional imaging is the mainstay in diagnosing thoracic trauma. During the critical phase with often concomitant shock, pelvic and spinal injuries tailored radiographic views or even upright chest radiographs are impractical. The severely traumatized patient is usually radiographed in the supine position and suboptimal roentgenograms may have to be accepted for several reasons. It is well documented that many abnormalities detected on CT were not apparent on conventional radiographs, but CT is reserved for hemodynamical stable patients. Nevertheless certain situations like aortic rupture require further evaluation by CT and aortography. The value of conventional radiography, CT, MRI and aortography in chest trauma is reviewed and typical radiographic findings are presented.
Adult, Diagnostic Imaging, Thoracic Injuries, Aortic Rupture, Diaphragm, Mediastinum, Lung Injury, Aortography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Humans, Pleura, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Lung
Adult, Diagnostic Imaging, Thoracic Injuries, Aortic Rupture, Diaphragm, Mediastinum, Lung Injury, Aortography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Humans, Pleura, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Lung
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
