
doi: 10.1007/bf00174011
pmid: 2244684
Scanning electron microscopic observations of connective tissue cells show a new aspect of the nature of fibroblasts, and the subsequent broad survey of references makes clear that fibroblasts of many tissues have various features which are regarded as atypical of fibroblasts, and at the same time that various connective tissue cells in different organs have features typical of fibroblasts. Both morphological and functional features of fibroblasts are more or less common to those of fibroblast-like cells, and differences among these cells are quantitative rather than qualitative. Therefore, it is almost impossible to set clear-cut criteria for distinguishing genuine fibroblasts from a large population of fibroblast-like cells. The majority of cells sharing features of fibroblasts, if not all, seem to belong to the same population of cells. They are probably adapted to special functional needs in their own micro-environment that are peculiar to local or pathological or experimental conditions. It is proposed to categorize these cells into subtypes depending on their main functions: 1, fibrogenesis; 2, tissue skeleton or barrier; 3, intercellular communication system; 4, gentle contractile machinery; 5, endocrine activity; and 6, vitamin A-storing. Re-evaluation of fibroblasts and fibroblast-like cells is required to facilitate their better understanding.
Male, Muscles, Leydig Cells, Cell Communication, Fibroblasts, Classification, Kidney, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals, Peripheral Nerves, Reticulum
Male, Muscles, Leydig Cells, Cell Communication, Fibroblasts, Classification, Kidney, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals, Peripheral Nerves, Reticulum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 143 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
