Natural versus haploscopic stereopsis

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Mar 1991 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, volume 229, pages 115-118 (issn: 0721-832X, eissn: 1435-702X,

Copyright policy )

Authors: J, Lang; C, Rechichi; J, Stürmer;

doi: 10.1007/bf00170541

pmid: 2044969

Natural versus haploscopic stereopsis

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Natural stereopsis is better with a large interpupillary distance (IPD). With haploscopic devices, depth perception is better with a small IPD. This apparently unknown fact has been trigonometrically calculated and experimentally shown by enlarging and diminishing the IPD in 20 subjects.

Keywords

Adult, Depth Perception, Vision, Binocular, Adolescent, Vision Tests, Humans

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

0

Average

Upload OA version

Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!

It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!

uploadUpload now