Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Naunyn-Schmiedeberg ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology
Article . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Inhibition of rat brain monoamine oxidase enzymes by fluoxetine and norfluoxetine

Authors: A, Holt; G B, Baker;

Inhibition of rat brain monoamine oxidase enzymes by fluoxetine and norfluoxetine

Abstract

Fluoxetine and its primary metabolite, norfluoxetine, are inhibitors of neuronal uptake of 5-hydroxytryptamine. While fluoxetine has also been reported to inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO) in vitro at concentrations much lower than those measured in brain following chronic fluoxetine treatment, neurochemical profiles are not consistent with substantial MAO inhibition in vivo. In an attempt to explain this inconsistency, we have examined the interactions of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine with rat brain MAO-A and -B by a radiochemical assay method. Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were competitive inhibitors of MAO-A in vitro, with Ki values of 76.3 microM and 90.5 microM, respectively. Both compounds were non-competitive or uncompetitive inhibitors of MAO-B in vitro. Inhibition of MAO-B was time-dependent and was very slowly reversible by dialysis. IC50 values versus metabolism of 50 microM beta-phenylethylamine were 17.8 microM (fluoxetine) and 18.5 microM (norfluoxetine). Analysis of the time-dependence of MAO-B inhibition by fluoxetine revealed that an initial competitive interaction between the enzyme and the inhibitor (Ki 245 microM) was followed by tight-binding enzyme inactivation (K(inact) 0.071 min-1). Following administration of fluoxetine (20 mg kg-1 day-1) for 7 days, the cortical concentration of fluoxetine + norfluoxetine was estimated by gas-liquid chromatography to be 700 microM. Such drug treatment reduced MAO-A activity by 23% in 1:8 (w/v) cortical homogenates, but not in 1:80 homogenates. Inhibition of MAO-B in 1:8 homogenates was modest (12%) and was not significantly reduced by homogenate dilution. The concentration of 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid, measured by high pressure liquid chromatography, was reduced by 47% in cortices from drug-treated rats, while concentrations of 5-hydroxytryptamine, noradrenaline, dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid were unchanged. These results suggest that, following chronic drug administration leading to relatively high tissue concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, inhibition of either form of MAO would be restricted by competition for the enzyme with intraneuronal amine substrates.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors, Brain, Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid, Binding, Competitive, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Kinetics, Fluoxetine, Animals, Dialysis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!